Writing Voice & Style
Plainspoken, direct, and human. Angry in drafts, clear in print.
Voice
- Direct, honest, avoid management‑speak
- Constructively critical: point to what’s broken and why it matters
- Empathetic without melodrama; frustration comes from care
- Tie policy to people
Style
- Reading level: accessible, natural; short paragraphs and clear headings
- Flow:
- Break arguments into chunks;
- Use bullets when it helps
- Shareable lines: keep quotable sentences self‑contained
- Evidence with punch:
- Numbers in plain terms
- No 'double-decker buses' that over-simplify and obscure
Tone
- Professional but natural
- Telling your Grandma what you do at work
- Avoid our own TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms), and expand on first and on occasional repeated uses
- Intent lives with the reader
- Wry and dry humour or mild exaggeration can support a point, but don't rely on it being interpreted as intended
- Perfect 'neutral' phrasing can be read as uncaring or even hostile.
- Distinguish analysis vs. commentary
- Opinion can spoil a fair assessment
Golden rules
- Clarity beats cleverness
- Show the human impact
- A clear argument is often better than a complete argument
- People are good, systems are complicated
- Critiques offer paths to better outcomes
Principles we work by
- Assume good intent
- Needs before wants
- Facts form a strong foundation
- Feelings do matter
- Systems before individual blame
- Be open to corrections
For technical commitments, see the AI Policy. For ongoing notes, see Lessons Learned.